Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics59.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory5.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220202
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 03 '23 at 20:43
Run Duration102 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 64.5
1-Core 111
2-Core 200
69% 125 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 527
57% 452 Pts
64-Core 509
32% 509 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
HP(103C 8574) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.78
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.1% Above average
Lighting 71.9
Reflection 82.8
Parallax 75.3
59% 76.7 fps
MRender 82.8
Gravity 68.8
Splatting 70.3
60% 74 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 215GB
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,703
Write 2,435
Mixed 2,930
2,275% 3,023 MB/s
4K Read 84.6
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 78
13,527% 78.2 MB/s
DQ Read 598
DQ Write 486
DQ Mixed 562
5,092% 548 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 93%
Qemu HARDDISK 11GB
10GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,147
Write 1,878
Mixed 2,037
1,524% 2,021 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 46.9
7,860% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 113
1,096% 126 MB/s
Poor: 0% Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x12GB
1 of 1 slots used
12GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
73.4% Very good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 24.1
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 19.1
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 15: 0P 1R 1G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
15% 9% 104 368 116 144 15.5" 1920 1080 AUO82ED
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 618 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback