Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory13.7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 13.7GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory11.3 GB free of 13.6719 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 14 '22 at 10:49
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Common KVM processor
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 7 cores, 7 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 80
1-Core 102
2-Core 172
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 478
54% 425 Pts
64-Core 479
30% 479 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 98%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 1.5TB
285GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.7 1.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
4.76% Terrible
Read 4.2
Write 0.3
Mixed 0.3
SusWrite 0.9
0% 1.43 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0
17% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 4.76%
Great: 38%
Qemu HARDDISK 150GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 214
Write 0.3
SusWrite 0.2
51% 71.5 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.5
756% 5.77 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 83%
Qemu HARDDISK 11GB
5GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
0.44% Terrible
Read 0.5
Write 5
Mixed 1
SusWrite 0.4
1% 1.73 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
77% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.44%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x13GB
1 of 1 slots used
13GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.2% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.5
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16.5
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $105Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback