Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-1799

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GL72M 7REX
MotherboardMSI MS-1799  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170711
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJul 30 '23 at 21:28
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
55% Above average
Memory 63.7
1-Core 93.1
2-Core 180
63% 112 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 297
36% 280 Pts
64-Core 306
19% 306 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
MSI(1462 11C9) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3640
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.8% Poor
Lighting 36.1
Reflection 43.3
Parallax 31.1
29% 36.8 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 40.3
Splatting 26.4
28% 34.6 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$39
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 950
Write 1,246
Mixed 996
239% 1,064 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 81
4K Mixed 46.2
156% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 681
DQ Write 562
DQ Mixed 676
492% 640 MB/s
Poor: 88% Great: 228%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$53
342GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 429
Write 377
Mixed 370
87% 392 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 57.7
4K Mixed 42.8
135% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 355
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 130%
SD Card 1GB
0GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7.7
Write 2.5
Mixed 3.2
5% 4.47 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 859B CT8G4SFRA32A.M8FR 16GB
2400, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.9% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 16.5
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 11.5
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 17.3" 1920 1080 CMN1735
Typical MS-1799 Builds (Compare 1,570 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1799

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback