Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive142% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardMACHINIST X99-MR9D PLUS
Memory53.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220625
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 21 '23 at 13:39
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 30%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2686 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 71.7
1-Core 83.1
2-Core 168
62% 108 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 615
54% 461 Pts
64-Core 1,728
107% 1,728 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$150
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.79
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.9% Poor
Lighting 38.4
Reflection 2
Parallax 30.2
31% 23.5 fps
MRender 26.8
Gravity 32.6
Splatting 29.6
24% 29.7 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
404GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXY70H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 739 614 620 603 598 612 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
142% Outstanding
Read 1,422
Write 1,018
Mixed 726
SusWrite 631
211% 949 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 42.2
4K Mixed 31.8
104% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 408
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 364
257% 331 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 142%
Great: 259%
Samsung MZ7KM960HMJP-00005 960GB
357GB free
Firmware: GXM5004Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 400 410 382 358 366 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 390
Write 402
Mixed 355
SusWrite 388
87% 384 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 39.9
4K Mixed 27.8
89% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 335
248% 328 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 123%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 114 111 113 110 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 162
Write 132
Mixed 79.1
SusWrite 111
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 96%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$80
103GB free
Firmware: MN6OAA10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 111 107 108 108 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 149
Write 153
Mixed 78.3
SusWrite 108
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF2G72PDZ-2G6J1 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
89.3% Excellent
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 36.6
MC Mixed 32.8
102% 35.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 13
34% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 97.4
41% 97.4 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 27" 1280 720 HKC0000 MU27V2
Typical string Builds (Compare 15,494 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback