Today's hottest deals

Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive259% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 22 '22 at 13:47
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$148
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Memory 90.1
1-Core 138
2-Core 275
92% 168 Pts
4-Core 501
8-Core 772
79% 636 Pts
64-Core 766
47% 766 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 92%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXY7501Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 686 553 560 544 534 655 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
259% Outstanding
Read 1,888
Write 1,377
Mixed 872
SusWrite 589
262% 1,181 MB/s
4K Read 61.9
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 79.9
283% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,465
DQ Write 1,233
DQ Mixed 1,103
893% 1,267 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 259%
Great: 259%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$66
606GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 155 155 154 151 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 144
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 153
88% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2
362% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 110%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
740GB free
Firmware: 1808
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 106 106 105 97 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 93.5
Write 56
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 102
56% 75.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSC.16FBD 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
84.1% Excellent
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 26.1
85% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 34.7
SC Mixed 26.3
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 6,485 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $439

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $907
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback