Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415MA_X415MA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415MA_X415MA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X415MA
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 16 '23 at 08:03
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10510U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.8% Poor
Memory 35.9
1-Core 57.6
2-Core 74.6
34% 56 Pts
4-Core 80.3
8-Core 83.6
11% 81.9 Pts
64-Core 82.1
5% 82.1 Pts
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Asus(1043 1762) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8984
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.72% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 2.1
2% 1.9 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2
Splatting 3.2
2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.72%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
872GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 66 72 101 70 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 212
Write 16.4
Mixed 33.8
SusWrite 78
62% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.7
165% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
MC Read 4
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 5.1
14% 4.97 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 4
11% 4 GB/s
Latency 222
18% 222 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415MA_X415MA Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415MA_X415MA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback