Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	4.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

11 months ago, 11 months ago.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6200U 135,462 User benchmarks, average bench 41% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	34% Below average	Memory 43.7 1-Core 51.9 2-Core 120 40% 71.8 Pts	4-Core 141 8-Core 147 19% 144 Pts	64-Core 157 10% 157 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake) 362,113 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Legend(17AA 2237) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9865 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	4.51% Terrible	Lighting 5.4 Reflection 2.3 Parallax 5.4 4% 4.37 fps	MRender 3.6 Gravity 4.9 Splatting 7.8 5% 5.43 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.51% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB 35,237 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 431GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT21B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 192 254 202 279 285 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	59.7% Above average	Read 323 Write 226 Mixed 304 SusWrite 235 61% 272 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 31.2 4K Mixed 20.2 72% 23.6 MB/s	DQ Read 230 DQ Write 229 DQ Mixed 184 151% 215 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 126%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron MIDAS FORCE-8G26MI 1x8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB Chip DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	17.1% Very poor	MC Read 7.4 MC Write 6 MC Mixed 5.3 18% 6.23 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 1.8 9% 3 GB/s	Latency 186 22% 186 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 39%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-6200UIntelBench 41%, 135,462 samples	2x

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	2x

SSD
860 EVO M.2 500GBSamsungBench 101%, 35,237 samples	2x

RAM
M471A5143EB0-CPB 1x4GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,518 samples	1x
MIDAS FORCE-8G26MI 1x8GBMicronBench 32%, 3 samples	1x