Intel S2600WTTR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive78.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
MotherboardIntel S2600WTTR  (all builds)
Memory60.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 29 '23 at 15:10
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630L v4
CPU1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 54.8
2-Core 107
52% 81.1 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 399
37% 306 Pts
64-Core 1,371
85% 1,371 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 63%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 250GB
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 209 219 231 246 254 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 366
Write 382
Mixed 355
SusWrite 226
75% 332 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 59.1
4K Mixed 41.1
132% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 148
124% 180 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 108%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$107
3TB free
Firmware: ACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 142 142 142 137 142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 167
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 140
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 108%
Amd-raid ST16000NM001G-2K 16TB
15TB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 20 20 20 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 32% Great: 146%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965600-023.A00G 9965600-012.A01G Hynix HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF Hynix HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.5% Good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 23.6
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 13.5
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S2600WTTR Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship

Motherboard: Intel S2600WTTR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback