Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Yacht	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	67.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	46.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191206
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 08 '21 at 20:52
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	73%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$155 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	74.4% Very good	Memory 79.2 1-Core 111 2-Core 200 74% 130 Pts	4-Core 375 8-Core 638 62% 506 Pts	64-Core 787 49% 787 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Gigabyte(1458 3FC7) CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing below potential (46^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	67.4% Good	Lighting 88.7 Reflection 86.6 Parallax 75.2 72% 83.5 fps	MRender 62.9 Gravity 78.7 Splatting 70.3 58% 70.6 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 250GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 166 100 100 98 95 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	46.8% Average	Read 328 Write 142 Mixed 149 SusWrite 118 41% 184 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 32.2 4K Mixed 17.9 66% 22.5 MB/s	DQ Read 128 DQ Write 146 DQ Mixed 91.5 82% 122 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 108%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47 218,164 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 382GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 83 81 84 83 82 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	52.1% Above average	Read 99.8 Write 95.2 Mixed 41 SusWrite 81.6 58% 79.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75 134,977 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	82.3% Excellent	MC Read 33.7 MC Write 26.5 MC Mixed 29.8 86% 30 GB/s	SC Read 21.3 SC Write 25.7 SC Mixed 22.6 66% 23.2 GB/s	Latency 82.1 49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 54: 6R 6G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
54%	25%	72	104	5	100	34"	3440 1440	MSI3DB6 MSI MAG342CQR

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,389 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	1,385x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	806x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	471x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	423x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	294x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	293x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	151x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	130x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	124x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	387x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	240x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	206x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $480

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16