Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardMACHINIST E5-RS9
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230306
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJun 28 '23 at 05:16
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User DOM-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 78.2
2-Core 175
63% 110 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 682
58% 500 Pts
64-Core 1,343
83% 1,343 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.Q1.1
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.1% Below average
Lighting 34.3
Reflection 57.5
Parallax 63.4
28% 51.7 fps
MRender 57.8
Gravity 50
Splatting 42.7
40% 50.2 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Airdisk 128GB SSD 128GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: .3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 365 355 206 90 91 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 456
Write 384
Mixed 379
SusWrite 246
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 65.6
4K Mixed 34
121% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 136
126% 190 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 80%
Seagate ST9250315AS 250GB-$60
54GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 48 47 47 46 46 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Read 50.2
Write 45.3
Mixed 29.1
SusWrite 46.7
32% 42.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
58.4% Above average
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 18.5
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 16.4
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 15,442 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback