Today's hottest deals

Pcspecialist Intel Home Office III

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics24.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive146% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemPcspecialist Intel Home Office III  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME H510M-A
Memory58.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 23 '23 at 15:01
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700F-$226
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Memory 80.8
1-Core 144
2-Core 284
92% 170 Pts
4-Core 566
8-Core 1,047
96% 806 Pts
64-Core 1,418
88% 1,418 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,802
Gainward(10B0 F297) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 531.79
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.5% Poor
Lighting 30
Reflection 30
Parallax 30
24% 30 fps
MRender 30
Gravity 30
Splatting 30
25% 30 fps
Poor: 290%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 402%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PCS M.2 NVME SSD 256GB
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0806A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 310 339 150 151 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
146% Outstanding
Read 1,668
Write 1,131
Mixed 984
SusWrite 232
222% 1,004 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 23.7
154% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 500
DQ Write 423
DQ Mixed 159
202% 361 MB/s
Poor: 146%
This bench: 146%
Great: 261%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
123GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 460 456 461 460 472 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 484
Mixed 456
SusWrite 463
108% 479 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 90.8
4K Mixed 56.7
186% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 352
264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 123%
Great: 137%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
631GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 190 190 189 188 189 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 175
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 189
109% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX4M2E3200C16 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.4% Very good
MC Read 26
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 21.8
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 22.1
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 79.1
50% 79.1 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Intel Home Office III Builds (Compare 177 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

System: Pcspecialist Intel Home Office III

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $349
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback