Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	30GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 30GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2-$345 10,301 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	66.1% Good	Memory 79.7 1-Core 89.5 2-Core 154 64% 108 Pts	4-Core 285 8-Core 401 43% 343 Pts	64-Core 423 26% 423 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 315 482 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 102F) 1GB CLim: 523 MHz, MLim: 437 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 392.58 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	1.21% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 1 Parallax 0.2 1% 0.87 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 1.5 Splatting 1.5 1% 1.67 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.21% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 18 16 13 15 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	38.2% Below average	Read 386 Write 47.7 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 16.8 27% 126 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 28.7 4K Mixed 12.4 60% 20 MB/s	DQ Read 153 DQ Write 25.8 DQ Mixed 28.5 36% 69 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 118%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 76GB free Firmware: 0A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 75 74 75 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	44.7% Average	Read 82.1 Write 75.2 Mixed 68.5 SusWrite 73.4 55% 74.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 86%
WD My Passport 2627 5TB 4,990 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 118GB free, PID 2627 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 70 69 69 68 68 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	Read 64.2 Write 64.4 Mixed 43.7 SusWrite 68.6 82% 60.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 0.7 182% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GU7AFR8C-PB Micron 9JSF25672AZ-1G9K1 Samsung M391B1G73QH0-CMA Micron 9JSF25672AZ-1G9K1 Micron 9JSF25672AZ-1G9K1 Micron 18JSF1G72AZ-1G9E1 30GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1600, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz 8192, 2048, 8192, 2048, 2048, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	68.5% Good	MC Read 26.1 MC Write 26.1 MC Mixed 26.2 75% 26.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 13.1 SC Mixed 11.2 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 81.1 49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 69%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	496x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	305x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	261x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	184x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	128x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	112x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 618 samples	65x
M391B5273DH0-CK0 8x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 244 samples	56x
9JSF51272AZ-1G9E2 4x4GBMicronBench 78%, 366 samples	55x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16