Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME X570-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics98.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-PRO  (all builds)
Memory53.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 23 '23 at 17:25
Run Duration361 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$330
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
46.2% Average
Memory 58.8
1-Core 53.5
2-Core 90
42% 67.4 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 332
31% 257 Pts
64-Core 916
57% 916 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$270
Nvidia(10DE 1F06) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.61
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.7% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 109
Parallax 124
97% 118 fps
MRender 172
Gravity 111
Splatting 100
101% 128 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 500GB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1132 1280 1264 1327 1314 1287 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,980
Write 1,828
Mixed 1,353
SusWrite 1,268
360% 1,607 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 61.4
4K Mixed 49.2
158% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 481
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 388
286% 380 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 223%
Great: 399%
Samsung 970 EVO 500GB
423GB free
Firmware: 3106
SusWrite @10s intervals: 496 595 598 629 638 635 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 59% Great: 208%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
931GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 440
Write 419
Mixed 405
94% 422 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 54.6
4K Mixed 40.3
131% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 196
147% 198 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
825GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 471
Write 410
Mixed 399
95% 427 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 56.1
4K Mixed 40.3
131% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 196
147% 197 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Samsung 970 EVO 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0212
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 670
Write 621
Mixed 609
141% 633 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 31.1
4K Mixed 31.2
107% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 32.7
DQ Mixed 24.1
31% 57.2 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 93%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$90
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 112
Write 95.9
Mixed 58
66% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 100%
WD Red 8TB (2017)-$196
7TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 193
Write 194
Mixed 108
122% 165 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1.9
372% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 110%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67
978GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 151
Write 133
Mixed 73.8
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2C3000C15 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
71.8% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 26.6
78% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 22.4
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X570-PRO Builds (Compare 5,531 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $1,049
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback