GPD G1619-04

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics25.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive143% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGPD G1619-04  (all builds)
MotherboardGPD G1619-04
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221027
Uptime11.5 Days
Run DateApr 23 '23 at 12:10
Run Duration277 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U Graphics
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Memory 63.1
1-Core 172
2-Core 331
98% 189 Pts
4-Core 612
8-Core 942
96% 777 Pts
64-Core 1,048
65% 1,048 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
AMD(1002 0124) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.7% Poor
Lighting 28.3
Reflection 47.1
Parallax 53.8
23% 43.1 fps
MRender 34.3
Gravity 33.3
Splatting 43.3
31% 37 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT4000P3PSSD8 4TB
2.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1498 83 84 403 87 366 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 1,643
Write 2,662
Mixed 108
SusWrite 420
270% 1,208 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 77.7
4K Mixed 6.3
121% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 748
DQ Write 86
DQ Mixed 166
185% 333 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 143%
Great: 530%
WD PC SN740 SDDPTQE-2T00 2TB
757GB free
Firmware: 73110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3896 3900 3902 3834 3847 3618 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
554% Outstanding
Read 4,221
Write 3,878
Mixed 2,887
SusWrite 3833
833% 3,705 MB/s
4K Read 66.1
4K Write 215
4K Mixed 85.7
324% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 1,024
DQ Write 1303
DQ Mixed 1,494
1,035% 1,274 MB/s
Poor: 176%
This bench: 554%
Great: 554%
Generic MassStorageClass 1TB
953GB free, PID 0764
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 41 45 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 174
Write 128
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 41.9
131% 107 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 4.3
280% 4.43 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 57%
Generic MassStorageClass 512GB
477GB free, PID 0764
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 169
Write 89.5
Mixed 104
SusWrite 41.6
122% 101 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 4.4
286% 4.47 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9JCNNNFA5MLYR-N6E 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
79.1% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 31.6
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 25.5
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G1619-04 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

System: GPD G1619-04

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 249% - Outstanding Total price: $280
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback