Today's hottest deals

To be filled by O.E.M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
19 months ago, 18 months ago.
MotherboardTo be filled by O.E.M  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '23 at 23:30
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 65.9
1-Core 164
2-Core 312
94% 181 Pts
4-Core 526
8-Core 879
86% 703 Pts
64-Core 1,052
65% 1,052 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3675
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
7.92% Terrible
Lighting 10.6
Reflection 16.1
Parallax 12.5
9% 13.1 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 1
Splatting 14.3
6% 7.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.92%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
YSR256GMLCT-E3C-2 256GB
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM90.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 761 758 817 758 932 971 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 702
Write 916
Mixed 730
SusWrite 833
180% 795 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 66.2
234% 94.2 MB/s
DQ Read 532
DQ Write 471
DQ Mixed 532
391% 512 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 174%
Great: 251%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD32D4S2S1MF-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
39.4% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 11.5
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 14.8
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical be filled by O.E.M Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To be filled by O.E.M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback