Asus Pro WS X570-ACE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 216%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 243%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics217% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus Pro WS X570-ACE  (all builds)
Memory115.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '23 at 04:25
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User PRI-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 75.8
1-Core 174
2-Core 339
103% 196 Pts
4-Core 687
8-Core 1,292
118% 989 Pts
64-Core 2,170
134% 2,170 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 102%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
Nvidia(10DE 1535) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.61
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
217% Outstanding
Lighting 322
Reflection 300
Parallax 370
262% 330 fps
MRender 361
Gravity 262
Splatting 193
214% 272 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 217%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS3040 1TB SSD
290GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS304130
SusWrite @10s intervals: 991 622 460 601 559 541 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 2,267
Write 2,608
Mixed 2,050
SusWrite 629
424% 1,889 MB/s
4K Read 52
4K Write 51.8
4K Mixed 51.3
172% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,150
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 363
344% 567 MB/s
Poor: 212%
This bench: 212%
Great: 513%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150
999GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 735 881 791 806 760 694 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 1,224
Write 1,092
Mixed 973
SusWrite 778
228% 1,017 MB/s
4K Read 51
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 52.1
173% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,155
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 339
331% 555 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 180%
Great: 435%
Asmt 2135 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 163 150 163 151 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 152
Write 156
Mixed 115
SusWrite 153
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1.7
441% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 117%
Asmt 2135 8TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 131 133 132 133 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
69% Good
Read 108
Write 135
Mixed 90.3
SusWrite 131
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.6
218% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 69%
Great: 117%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 38.5TB
21.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 25 37 7.4 9.2 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21% Poor
Read 55.5
Write 40.5
Mixed 2.3
SusWrite 18
21% 29.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.07 MB/s
G-raid Thunderbolt 3 24TB
16.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 403 359 364 343 306 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 433
Write 419
Mixed 251
SusWrite 352
267% 364 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 4.4
2,063% 15.3 MB/s
Poor: 151%
This bench: 229%
Great: 229%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot Memory 3200 C16 Series 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
91.3% Outstanding
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 31.5
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 24.3
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 31.7
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 88.7
45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 85%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro WS X570-ACE Builds (Compare 359 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 183%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 209%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro WS X570-ACE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $1,650
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback