Today's hottest deals

Intel X99H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics72.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive132% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemIntel X99
MotherboardIntel X99H  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 08 '23 at 17:39
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
63.8% Good
Memory 76.3
1-Core 59.6
2-Core 131
54% 88.9 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 491
46% 384 Pts
64-Core 805
50% 805 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$218
Nvidia(10DE 13D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 526.47
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.1% Very good
Lighting 90.4
Reflection 90.4
Parallax 83.4
74% 88.1 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 78.4
Splatting 71
69% 86.8 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0C-00AJM0 240GB
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 231050WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 132 134 133 134 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 1,402
Write 1,006
Mixed 987
SusWrite 163
198% 890 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 77.9
4K Mixed 42.4
152% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 601
DQ Write 245
DQ Mixed 267
239% 371 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 132%
Great: 189%
SSD 512GB 512GB
376GB free
Firmware: FW201219
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 361 356 364 355 364 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 484
Write 371
Mixed 352
SusWrite 360
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 51.1
4K Mixed 14.5
98% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 20.3
72% 157 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 211%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
915GB free
Firmware: 2BA30002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 106 104 104 105 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 108
Write 73
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 102
64% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown atermiter 1x16GB
1 of 24 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.3% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 10.7
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 11.3
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 87.7
46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99H Builds (Compare 1,257 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Intel X99H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback