Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HUANANZHI
Motherboard	HUANANZHI X99-QD4
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20221010
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Sep 01 '23 at 17:10
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 1,056 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	68.5% Good	Memory 78.1 1-Core 82.8 2-Core 158 63% 106 Pts	4-Core 317 8-Core 611 55% 464 Pts	64-Core 1,196 74% 1,196 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 84DC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 275 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.11% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 4.7 Parallax 1.7 3% 3.4 fps	MRender 4.4 Gravity 4.2 Splatting 3.2 3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.11% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 22,748 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0910A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 24 49 46 47 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	39.9% Below average	Read 515 Write 45.2 Mixed 48.7 SusWrite 41.4 34% 163 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 27.3 4K Mixed 0.9 49% 16.7 MB/s	DQ Read 149 DQ Write 21.2 DQ Mixed 0.2 22% 56.7 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 94%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB 266,123 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 724GB free Firmware: 2BA30001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 101 100 102 101 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	Read 100 Write 103 Mixed 57.3 SusWrite 101 66% 90.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown atermiter 1x16GB 988 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (96^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39.6% Below average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 12.8 MC Mixed 11.8 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 12.3 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 84.1 48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	60	60	18.5"	1280 720	AOC1954 T954we

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback