Lenovo 90Q800CEUS

Performance Results


Gaming 94% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 88% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	93.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

13 months ago, 5 months ago.

System	Lenovo 90Q800CEUS (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 3715
Memory	7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210415
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 06 '23 at 21:32
Run Duration	203 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10700K-$220 198,859 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	98.5% Outstanding	Memory 93.4 1-Core 143 2-Core 283 96% 173 Pts	4-Core 556 8-Core 858 87% 707 Pts	64-Core 1,318 82% 1,318 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 98.5% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$255 447,556 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Legend(17AA 2088) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 528.49 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	93.8% Outstanding	Lighting 122 Reflection 109 Parallax 123 99% 118 fps	MRender 138 Gravity 100 Splatting 78.9 84% 106 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 93.8% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000L7 512GB 12,020 User benchmarks, average bench 248% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5M2QEXF7 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,928 Write 2,037 Mixed 1,474 405% 1,813 MB/s	4K Read 52.7 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 70.2 231% 79.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,238 DQ Write 862 DQ Mixed 893 709% 998 MB/s
Poor: 130% Great: 347%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$90 129,044 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 37GB free Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 410 237 215 179 145 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	93.8% Outstanding	Read 461 Write 441 Mixed 423 SusWrite 239 88% 391 MB/s	4K Read 34.2 4K Write 66.1 4K Mixed 46.4 146% 48.9 MB/s	DQ Read 360 DQ Write 306 DQ Mixed 328 247% 332 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 93.8% Great: 137%
WD easystore 25FA 2TB 545 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1.5TB free, PID 25fa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	20.1% Poor	Read 51.6 Write 36 Mixed 27.4 SusWrite 37.6 49% 38.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 81% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Tigo LMKU8G68AHFHD-32A 2x8GB 520 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.8% Very good	MC Read 29.8 MC Write 26.2 MC Mixed 23 75% 26.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.4 SC Write 24.6 SC Mixed 19 57% 20 GB/s	Latency 61.2 65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 92%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 90Q800CEUS Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 100%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 100%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 99%

Nuclear submarine

System: Lenovo 90Q800CEUS

CPU
Core i7-10700KIntel $220Bench 97%, 198,859 samples	71x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $255Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	60x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	7x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	1x

SSD
MZVLB512HBJQ-000L7 512GBSamsungBench 248%, 12,020 samples	48x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $149Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	6x
SSD 120GBBench 68%, 22,748 samples	2x

RAM
LMKU8G68AHFHD-32A 2x8GBTigoBench 86%, 520 samples	27x
LV32D4U2S8HD-8X 2x8GBKingstonBench 87%, 541 samples	17x
BL8G32C16U4B.8FE Tigo LMKU8G68AHFHD-32A BL8G32C16U4B.8FE Tigo LMKU8G68AHFHD-32A 32GBCrucialBench 87%, 6 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $475

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo 90Q800CEUS

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Lenovo 90Q800CEUS

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)