Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 630 13 inch G9 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive158% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteBook 630 13 inch G9 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 897A
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220524
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 04 '23 at 18:48
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1255U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 63
1-Core 165
2-Core 293
92% 174 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 805
79% 647 Pts
64-Core 961
60% 961 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 77%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 897A) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1960
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Lighting 19.7
Reflection 24.2
Parallax 23.9
16% 22.6 fps
MRender 20.5
Gravity 27.6
Splatting 18.1
18% 22.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00BH1 512GB
427GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1NFAV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 549 814 759 978 883 343 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 1,007
Write 1,016
Mixed 862
SusWrite 721
203% 901 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 78.8
4K Mixed 52
170% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 688
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 518
370% 486 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 158%
Great: 219%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6DJR8N-XN 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 18.1
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 17.7
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 52%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 630 13 inch G9 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 630 13 inch G9 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback