Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-P55-USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	22.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P55-USB3 (all builds)
Memory	10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20101101
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 26 '15 at 22:50
Run Duration	209 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 760-$90 34,495 User benchmarks, average bench 64% Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	57.9% Above average	Memory 94.7 1-Core 62 2-Core 80.6 55% 79.1 Pts	4-Core 127 8-Core 124 17% 125 Pts	64-Core 124 8% 124 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203 42,130 User benchmarks, average bench 26% XFX(1682 3250) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.300.1025.0 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	22.1% Poor	Lighting 24.7 Reflection 27.9 Parallax 38.8 20% 30.5 fps	MRender 27.4 Gravity 28.9 Splatting 36.5 26% 31 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 240GB-$199 10,165 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 28GB free Firmware: 2.22 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 3533583 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 123067992925372 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 73 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 37 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 3533583 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 3533583 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 3533583 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 732 (EA) Unknown 0 0 965 (F1) Unknown 0 0 965 (F2) Unknown 0 0 6512	54.7% Above average	Read 170 Write 157 Mixed 137 34% 155 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 80.9 4K Mixed 18 106% 41.8 MB/s	DQ Read 161 DQ Write 170 DQ Mixed 46 68% 126 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 66%
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215 19,372 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 3GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 6 0 6 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 27035 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 73 (E8) Unknown 100 100 346113956613 (E9) Unknown 69 0 69	58.3% Above average	Read 264 Write 209 Mixed 230 52% 234 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 45.1 4K Mixed 24.6 90% 30.9 MB/s	DQ Read 173 DQ Write 147 DQ Mixed 86.3 85% 136 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$45 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 813GB free Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 108 99 16081064 (03) Spinup time 94 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3073 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 50 44 532588910534 (09) Power-on hours count 71 71 25931 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 69 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 70 0 24421739200542 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 33 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 75 75 50154 (C2) HDA temperature 30 141 -140737488355298 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 78035260806979 (F1) Unknown 100 253 10373209307 (F2) Unknown 100 253 14786543296	84.6% Excellent	Read 151 Write 144 Mixed 135 108% 143 MB/s	4K Read 0.86 4K Write 1.08 4K Mixed 0.34 94% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 113%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100 19,960 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 244GB free Firmware: CC34 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 111 98 37345318 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 8165 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 83 60 221802473 (09) Power-on hours count 47 47 46645 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 131 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 97 97 3 (BC) Unknown 100 95 47245361171 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 61 555089949 (C2) HDA temperature 29 40 73014444061 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 46 33 37345318 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 114499533173395 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3477340175 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2984287161	38.2% Below average	Read 70.1 Write 62.7 Mixed 79.2 54% 70.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.29 4K Mixed 0.24 72% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 61%
Hitachi HDT72101 1TB 251 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 146GB free Firmware: A31B Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 98 98 131074 (02) Throughput performance 130 130 120 (03) Spinup time 124 124 38683935195 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 11345 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 123 123 34 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 54789 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 145 (C0) Power-off retract count 90 90 12922 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 90 90 12922 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 219044708386 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1	33.9% Below average	Read 63.4 Write 54.5 Mixed 91.7 54% 69.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.44 88% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	47.6% Average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 17.4 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 12.7 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 57.9 69% 57.9 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-P55-USB3 Builds (Compare 451 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55-USB3

CPU
Core i5 760Intel $90Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	147x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	89x
Core i5-750Intel $60Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	74x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	28x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	21x
GTX 460Nvidia $203Bench 12%, 31,648 samples	19x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	14x
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	99x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	70x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	60x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $234

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $274	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350