Today's hottest deals

HP 500-278nf

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 500-278nf  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory9.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140205
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 25 '23 at 15:31
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$115
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 105
2-Core 211
74% 132 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 517
56% 443 Pts
64-Core 525
32% 525 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.29
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.6% Above average
Lighting 67.3
Reflection 71.9
Parallax 65.7
55% 68.3 fps
MRender 66.2
Gravity 68.6
Splatting 64.5
54% 66.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SH00M128GB 128GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HC1A254P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 338 230 256 30 23 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 488
Write 381
Mixed 355
SusWrite 180
78% 351 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 62
4K Mixed 14.1
98% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 17.6
58% 121 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 66%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
270GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 128 126 130 129 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 122
Write 116
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 126
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
229% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$70
3GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 192
Write 176
Mixed 66.8
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.1
598% 4.43 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273EB0-CK0 M378B1G73DB0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
51.1% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 15.1
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 16.3
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-278nf Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-278nf

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $210
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback