Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 690-00xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 690-00xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 843B
Memory5.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191121
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateMar 24 '23 at 12:36
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$83
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Memory 89.8
1-Core 95.5
2-Core 241
79% 142 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 621
70% 548 Pts
64-Core 621
38% 621 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Asus(1043 881A) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.14
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
6.43% Terrible
Lighting 7.9
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 9.1
6% 8.47 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 6.8
6% 8.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.43%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv128g TOSHIBA 128GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ADHA0102
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 664
Write 432
Mixed 164
92% 420 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 38.9
122% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 43
DQ Write 50.4
DQ Mixed 42.6
33% 45.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 135%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$47
718GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 150 163 159 150 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 180
Mixed 37
SusWrite 157
101% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 98%
Great: 107%
Seagate Basic 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 24 23 23 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 29.3
Write 35.6
Mixed 33.1
SusWrite 23.4
23% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.3
117% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 67%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
629GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 18 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 32.6
Write 37.1
Mixed 29.4
SusWrite 18.9
40% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
139% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CTD M378A5244CB0-CTD 12GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
58.6% Above average
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 17.7
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 19.4
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Desktop 690-00xx Builds (Compare 2,084 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 690-00xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $216
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback