Alaska A_M_I

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics46.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlaska A_M_I  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory0.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 12 '23 at 15:33
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.4% Above average
Memory 58.4
1-Core 58.4
2-Core 119
46% 78.5 Pts
4-Core 239
8-Core 420
40% 330 Pts
64-Core 439
27% 439 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.3% Average
Lighting 56
Reflection 65.7
Parallax 59
46% 60.2 fps
MRender 66.8
Gravity 58.9
Splatting 52
48% 59.2 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso SSD 512GB
379GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0823A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 198 262 314 347 343 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 386
Write 339
Mixed 304
SusWrite 284
74% 328 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 21
90% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 51.4
86% 162 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 186C0 V3 Series 1x8GB
1 of 5 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
49.9% Average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 18.3
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 7.5
22% 7.67 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A_M_I Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Alaska A_M_I

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $143
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback