Alaska A_M_I

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlaska A_M_I  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory13.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 10 '23 at 00:00
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.3% Very good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 92.8
2-Core 192
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 441
46% 372 Pts
64-Core 452
28% 452 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.1% Average
Lighting 57.1
Reflection 67.4
Parallax 60.2
46% 61.6 fps
MRender 67.2
Gravity 59.4
Splatting 52.6
48% 59.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso SSD 512GB
437GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0823A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 84 91 92 92 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 360
Write 154
Mixed 212
SusWrite 86.4
45% 203 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 23.9
93% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 50.9
63% 112 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 102%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 78 78 79 80 80 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 85.8
Write 84.8
Mixed 57.4
SusWrite 76.5
56% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 186C0 V3 Series 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.9% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 18.8
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 12.4
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A_M_I Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Alaska A_M_I

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $143
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback