Gigabyte GA-Z270X-UD3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics80.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z270X-UD3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-UD3-CF  (all builds)
Memory19.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161124
Uptime9.7 Days
Run DateNov 25 '17 at 04:44
Run Duration548 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$228
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Memory 93.8
1-Core 143
2-Core 286
96% 174 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 783
77% 632 Pts
64-Core 783
48% 783 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.4% Excellent
Lighting 99.7
Reflection 109
Parallax 89.3
81% 99.2 fps
MRender 92
Gravity 97.8
Splatting 97.7
79% 95.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
446GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 391
Mixed 409
97% 434 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 29.4
163% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 42.1
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 29.1
36% 61.8 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 133%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 160
Write 143
Mixed 146
113% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 2.47
4K Mixed 0.25
110% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 101%
ST4000VN 008-2DR166 4TB
3TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.1% Good
Read 165
Write 159
Mixed 68.9
158% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 2.09
4K Mixed 0.28
82% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 65%
ST4000DM 000-2AE166 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 140
Write 143
Mixed 135
180% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 1.92
4K Mixed 0.3
78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 58%
ST4000DM 005-2DP166 4TB
511GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 112
Write 112
Mixed 104
140% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.28
72% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 66%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB
411GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Read 93.5
Write 34.6
Mixed 78.5
81% 68.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.2
72% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 42%
ST2000VX 003-1HH164 2TB
167GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 138
Write 144
Mixed 72
146% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 0.22
60% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 56%
Great: 56%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB
2GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
6.44% Terrible
Read 31
Write 2.65
Mixed 4.01
10% 12.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.75
4K Write 0.003
4K Mixed 0.006
22% 1.92 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.44%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB-$110
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
85.4% Excellent
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 35
MC Mixed 27
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 27.3
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 60.3
66% 60.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270X-UD3-CF Builds (Compare 409 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-UD3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $638
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback