Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory51.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '23 at 23:03
Run Duration286 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 70%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$202
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 86.3
1-Core 160
2-Core 329
102% 192 Pts
4-Core 624
8-Core 993
99% 808 Pts
64-Core 1454
90% 1454 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 101%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
MSI(1462 3904) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.18
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 231
Reflection 211
Parallax 205
188% 216 fps
Gravity 155
Splatting 137
128% 146 fps
Poor: 135% Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TB
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 613000WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,846
Write 3,180
Mixed 2718
652% 2,914 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 78.7
238% 87 MB/s
DQ Read 1,410
DQ Write 1,084
DQ Mixed 1,228
924% 1,241 MB/s
Poor: 264% Great: 573%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$37
440GB free
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1287 981 958 979 974 946 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
247% Outstanding
Read 1,785
Write 1,649
Mixed 1,618
SusWrite 1,021
341% 1,518 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 57.7
201% 75.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,280
DQ Write 1,010
DQ Mixed 1,128
849% 1,139 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 247%
Great: 297%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
216GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 432 416 418 423 406 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 321
Mixed 394
SusWrite 419
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 72
4K Mixed 48.9
144% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 204
154% 208 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
406GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 392 399 398 432 425 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 444
Write 329
Mixed 394
SusWrite 406
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 72.6
4K Mixed 50.6
152% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 205
155% 209 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 100%
Great: 133%
WD WD40EFZX-68AWUN0 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 200 196 197 199 194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 208
Write 172
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 196
120% 164 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.8
272% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 116%
Great: 116%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
1TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 161 161 161 164 162 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 151
Write 93.6
Mixed 73.7
SusWrite 159
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 64GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
84.1% Excellent
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 31.7
84% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 27.7
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 33.2
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,191 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $475

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,462
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback