Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 137% UFO	Desktop 103% UFO	Workstation 133% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	56 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220427
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 23 '23 at 02:53
Run Duration	266 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$175 128,080 User benchmarks, average bench 98% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	102% Outstanding	Memory 79.3 1-Core 173 2-Core 341 104% 198 Pts	4-Core 673 8-Core 1,018 105% 846 Pts	64-Core 1,478 92% 1,478 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 112%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$490 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% Nvidia(10DE 146B) ≥ 4GB; GeForce RTX 3070 Founders Edition CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.49 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	134% Outstanding	Lighting 213 Reflection 203 Parallax 196 174% 204 fps	MRender 198 Gravity 149 Splatting 0.3 82% 116 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 134% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX7000 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB 2,182 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: CB1.1.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 215 36 56 52 61 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 534 Write 452 Mixed 452 SusWrite 107 86% 386 MB/s	4K Read 34.6 4K Write 174 4K Mixed 53.4 213% 87.5 MB/s	DQ Read 132 DQ Write 452 DQ Mixed 170 166% 252 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 108%
WDC WDS400T2B0A-00SM50 4TB 1,668 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 3TB free Firmware: 415000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 393 384 405 397 392 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	96.4% Outstanding	Read 412 Write 424 Mixed 336 SusWrite 400 89% 393 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 98.7 4K Mixed 40.7 149% 56.2 MB/s	DQ Read 240 DQ Write 195 DQ Mixed 206 158% 214 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 96.4% Great: 115%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB 29,078 User benchmarks, average bench 231% 835GB free Firmware: EDFMB0.5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1487 316 313 312 315 314 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	230% Outstanding	Read 1,377 Write 1,865 Mixed 1,446 SusWrite 509 293% 1,299 MB/s	4K Read 50.9 4K Write 208 4K Mixed 78.8 288% 112 MB/s	DQ Read 1,172 DQ Write 1,294 DQ Mixed 1,222 923% 1,229 MB/s
Poor: 145% ↑ This bench: 230% Great: 310%
ST12000N M0117-2GY101 12TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 4.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 0.1 0 0 0 0 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.2% Above average	Read 195 Write 172 Mixed 179 SusWrite 0.3 174% 137 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 1.5 320% 10.5 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 91%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB 203 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 613GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 163 164 164 164 164 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	59.4% Above average	Read 142 Write 104 Mixed 80.3 SusWrite 164 163% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 57% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 62%
WDC WD18 0EDFZ-11AFWA0 18TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 4.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	54% Above average	Read 209 Write 200 Mixed 133 SusWrite 1.7 169% 136 MB/s	4K Read 7.7 4K Write 7 4K Mixed 2.4 348% 5.7 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 83%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB 210 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 3TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 162 164 164 164 165 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	70.3% Very good	Read 118 Write 132 Mixed 130 SusWrite 164 191% 136 MB/s	4K Read 6.6 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 0.7 225% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x16GB 55 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	80% Very good	MC Read 34.1 MC Write 20.2 MC Mixed 30.6 81% 28.3 GB/s	SC Read 26.3 SC Write 20 SC Mixed 32.8 75% 26.4 GB/s	Latency 81.8 49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,889 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,658x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,278x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $115Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,421x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $490Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,242x
RTX 3080Nvidia $909Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,081x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,472x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $81Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,840x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,107x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	867x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	772x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	727x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $1,013

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16