Packard EasyNote LM98

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Packard EasyNote LM98 (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard SJV71_CP
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20101102
Uptime	1.5 Days
Run Date	Jan 03 '21 at 07:48
Run Duration	208 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	46%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 430 14,318 User benchmarks, average bench 39% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.25 GHz Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	41.9% Average	Memory 64.1 1-Core 58.5 2-Core 86.6 44% 69.7 Pts	4-Core 112 8-Core 142 16% 127 Pts	64-Core 141 9% 141 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470 14,621 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0379) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.763.1.1000 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.22% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 3.7 Parallax 2 1% 2.37 fps	MRender 2.2 Gravity 1 Splatting 1.8 1% 1.67 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.22% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSTFS31256GTND 256GB 3,461 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 114GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 99 150 61 91 54 MB/s Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51% Above average	Read 234 Write 118 Mixed 194 SusWrite 94.8 36% 160 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 42.1 4K Mixed 25.9 94% 31 MB/s	DQ Read 148 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 10.9 49% 109 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 90%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71 21,137 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 318GB free Firmware: PB4OC60F SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 71 75 55 74 76 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	39.2% Below average	Read 65.5 Write 63.8 Mixed 35.5 SusWrite 70.8 43% 58.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 45%
HP Portable HD BB07 500GB 240 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 316GB free, PID bb07 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 23 22 24 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Read 30.5 Write 23.8 Mixed 15.8 SusWrite 22.4 30% 23.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 25% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 36%
WDC WD80 EMAZ-00M9AA0 8TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 3TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 1.8 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	17.1% Very poor	Read 27.8 Write 24.5 Mixed 20.8 SusWrite 1.5 23% 18.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 1.2 183% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 67%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB 210 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 4TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 1.8 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	16% Very poor	Read 23 Write 24 Mixed 23.5 SusWrite 1.4 24% 18 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.7 162% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 74%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 6,017 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 832GB free, PID a007 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.5 1.1 1.4 0.9 1.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Read 31.5 Write 27 Mixed 20 SusWrite 1.6 25% 20 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 43%
WDC WD10 EZEX-00BN5A0 1TB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 414GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 21 22 22 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 27.5 Write 24.5 Mixed 23.5 SusWrite 21.4 32% 24.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1.1 102% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GB 10,285 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1334 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24.4% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 10.3 24% 8.37 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 5.4 SC Mixed 6.7 18% 6.2 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EasyNote LM98 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote LM98

CPU
Core i5 M 480IntelBench 41%, 16,023 samples	3x
Pentium P6200IntelBench 36%, 8,041 samples	3x
Core i5 M 430IntelBench 39%, 14,318 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon HD 6500MAMDBench 3%, 12,937 samples	6x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	5x
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples	3x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	2x
INTENSO 128GBBench 65%, 3,345 samples	1x
PLUS 480GBSSDBench 87%, 5,109 samples	1x

RAM
NT2GC64B8HC0NS-CG 2x2GBNanyaBench 29%, 2,059 samples	5x
M471B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 5,297 samples	2x
ACR256X64D3S1333C9 2x2GBKingstonBench 29%, 3,134 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 37% - Below average

Total price: $53

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16