Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardMACHINIST X99-MR9D PLUS
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220121
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '23 at 18:01
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 77.5
1-Core 79.9
2-Core 148
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 571
52% 435 Pts
64-Core 1,142
71% 1,142 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5500-XT-$217
AMD(1002 0B0C) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.9% Average
Lighting 65.3
Reflection 64.6
Parallax 106
53% 78.6 fps
MRender 53
Gravity 72.5
Splatting 39.4
44% 55 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nx-2tb 2280 2TB
965GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN09843
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1416 1259 875 714 564 475 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 1,523
Write 1,524
Mixed 1,498
SusWrite 884
305% 1,357 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 53.9
4K Mixed 45.4
147% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 311
228% 301 MB/s
Poor: 174%
This bench: 174%
Great: 373%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
926GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 173 170 171 175 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 122
Mixed 87.2
SusWrite 172
102% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M386A4G40DM0-CPB 1x31GB
1 of 16 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
34.9% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 10.9
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 11
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 85.3
47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 15,219 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback