Lenovo 80E1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80E1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 4B2
Memory2.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150430
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 23 '17 at 14:36
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6410 APU R5 Graphics
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Memory 60
1-Core 30.4
2-Core 49
32% 46.5 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 74
13% 91 Pts
64-Core 96.7
6% 96.7 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
Legend(17AA 3801) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.662.4
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
1.5% Terrible
Lighting 1.53
Reflection 3.69
Parallax 2.5
1% 2.58 fps
MRender 2.95
Gravity 1.33
Splatting 2.87
2% 2.39 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.5%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 493
Write 381
Mixed 408
95% 428 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 41.1
4K Mixed 16.9
80% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 89.6
DQ Write 80
DQ Mixed 15.5
31% 61.7 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 124%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
222GB free
Firmware: 0002LVM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 88.6
Write 82.1
Mixed 74.8
61% 81.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 0.59
4K Mixed 0.11
43% 0.39 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CK0 RMT3170ME68F9F1600 6GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20% Very poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 7.3
19% 6.67 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 6.8
16% 5.43 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80E1 Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80E1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback