Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 13% Tree trunk	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

14 months ago, 14 months ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core M-5Y10c 3,050 User benchmarks, average bench 44% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	9% Terrible	Memory 7.68 1-Core 18.6 2-Core 39.2 11% 21.8 Pts	4-Core 63.1 8-Core 40.4 7% 51.8 Pts	64-Core 40 2% 40 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 9% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Core M HD 5300 7,223 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Elitegroup(1019 9AF4) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	1.2% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 2.1 1% 1.53 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 1.6 Splatting 1.7 1% 1.8 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.2% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKJW120H6 120GB 480 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: RG11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 126 130 155 149 152 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.6% Below average	Read 260 Write 186 Mixed 202 SusWrite 138 44% 196 MB/s	4K Read 10.4 4K Write 12.9 4K Mixed 9.7 35% 11 MB/s	DQ Read 100 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 80.9 70% 101 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HMT851S6AMR6A-PB 1x4GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 1 of 3 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	9.4% Terrible	MC Read 3.1 MC Write 3.7 MC Mixed 3.6 10% 3.47 GB/s	SC Read 1.4 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 1.8 5% 1.87 GB/s	Latency 426 9% 426 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.4% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core M-5Y10cIntelBench 44%, 3,050 samples	3x

GPU
Core M HD 5300IntelBench 3%, 7,223 samples	3x

SSD
SSDSCKJW120H6 120GBIntelBench 70%, 480 samples	3x

RAM
HMT851S6AMR6A-PB 1x4GBKingstonBench 22%, 6 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16