Today's hottest deals

Asus GL552JX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAsus GL552JX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL552JX
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151222
Uptime1 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '18 at 10:45
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 94.6
2-Core 193
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 459
51% 403 Pts
64-Core 469
29% 469 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 1A8D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.04% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 15.7
Parallax 7.06
3% 8.96 fps
MRender 8.62
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 8.3
5% 6.41 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.04%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKJW120H6 120GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RG11 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 353
Write 168
Mixed 218
54% 246 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 52.5
4K Mixed 15.7
71% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 38.4
60% 111 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 85%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
494GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 99.8
Write 104
Mixed 108
79% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.2
73% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 Kingston 99U5428-079.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.1% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 13.6
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 16.3
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL552JX Builds (Compare 649 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL552JX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback