Asrockrack H97M WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics9.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrockrack H97M WS  (all builds)
Memory29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180312
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '23 at 15:55
Run Duration287 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 96.9
1-Core 101
2-Core 216
80% 138 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 525
57% 454 Pts
64-Core 544
34% 544 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
ASRock(1849 162A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
9.09% Terrible
Lighting 10.7
Reflection 7.7
Parallax 14.8
9% 11.1 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 11.1
Splatting 12.3
10% 11.9 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.09%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$95
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 553 553 413 310 310 312 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,244
Write 1,095
Mixed 969
SusWrite 408
208% 929 MB/s
4K Read 55.6
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 70.2
234% 79.5 MB/s
DQ Read 973
DQ Write 923
DQ Mixed 999
736% 965 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 190%
Great: 280%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
425GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 233 277 328 328 328 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 474
Mixed 397
SusWrite 288
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 97.5
4K Mixed 48.3
167% 60.3 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 361
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 106%
Great: 121%
Samsung 870 QVO 4TB-$294
1.5TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 233 276 328 328 327 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 465
Mixed 418
SusWrite 288
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 53.9
182% 64.7 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 359
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 110%
Great: 128%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
1.5TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 233 276 327 328 328 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 459
Mixed 414
SusWrite 288
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 96.8
4K Mixed 54.5
181% 63.5 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 358
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 110%
Great: 128%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$72
326GB free
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,377
Write 1,900
Mixed 1,462
355% 1,580 MB/s
4K Read 58
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 76.3
252% 86.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,414
DQ Write 928
DQ Mixed 1,140
859% 1,161 MB/s
Poor: 144% Great: 295%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB
23GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 76.4
Write 47.2
Mixed 53.7
71% 59.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 3.7
243% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CML16GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CMZ32GX3M4X1600C10 0215 CML16GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CMZ32GX3M4X1600C10 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.2% Very good
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 23
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 17.7
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 50.7
79% 50.7 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M WS Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrockrack H97M WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback