Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Intel X99H

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	37.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	20.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

21 months ago, 21 months ago.

System	Intel X99
Motherboard	Intel X99H (all builds)
Memory	10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20221019
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 08 '23 at 23:19
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	28%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 6,890 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	61.6% Good	Memory 80.2 1-Core 66.9 2-Core 124 56% 90.3 Pts	4-Core 233 8-Core 384 38% 309 Pts	64-Core 426 26% 426 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$131 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 22F9) ≥ 4GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 30.0.13033.1000 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	37.4% Below average	Lighting 43.9 Reflection 52.7 Parallax 70.4 36% 55.7 fps	MRender 53.8 Gravity 60.7 Splatting 38.6 41% 51 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1H5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 29 53 40 34 37 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	20.7% Poor	Read 155 Write 95.3 Mixed 91.8 SusWrite 36.4 21% 94.7 MB/s	4K Read 11.2 4K Write 15.4 4K Mixed 9.5 37% 12 MB/s	DQ Read 20.6 DQ Write 21.1 DQ Mixed 18.2 14% 20 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 100%
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 320GB-$50 10,446 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 16GB free Firmware: AX001A SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 71 71 71 71 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	38.4% Below average	Read 62.6 Write 68.8 Mixed 29.9 SusWrite 70.9 42% 58 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 54%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$26 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 67GB free Firmware: 02.03E02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 81 82 81 84 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	46.7% Average	Read 81.3 Write 92.2 Mixed 57.5 SusWrite 81.1 57% 78 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 1x16GB 604 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 24 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 10.1 MC Mixed 9.5 27% 9.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 9.6 27% 9.6 GB/s	Latency 80.1 50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99H Builds (Compare 1,257 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Intel X99H

CPU
Xeon E5-2670 v3IntelBench 66%, 3,953 samples	357x
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples	188x
Xeon E5-2650 v4IntelBench 66%, 1,056 samples	106x

GPU
RX 580-2048SPAMDBench 41%, 38,816 samples	106x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $218Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	90x
RX 580AMD $131Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	74x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	38x
A400 480GBKingston $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	32x
512GB 512GBSSDBench 87%, 6,819 samples	28x

RAM
atermiter 1x16GBUnknownBench 36%, 988 samples	158x
HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 1x16GBHynixBench 37%, 604 samples	117x
DDR4 8GB 3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 57%, 462 samples	75x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 23% - Poor

Total price: $25

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370