User System

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	51.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago.

System	HUANANZHI
Motherboard	HUANANZHI X99-QD4
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220701
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 17 '22 at 10:41
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 6,890 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	Memory 89.5 1-Core 89.6 2-Core 157 68% 112 Pts	4-Core 329 8-Core 552 54% 440 Pts	64-Core 690 43% 690 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Gigabyte(1458 3642) 2GB CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.40 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Lighting 17.7 Reflection 17.1 Parallax 16.6 14% 17.1 fps	MRender 22.3 Gravity 18.3 Splatting 15.4 15% 18.7 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 179GB free (System drive) Firmware: B1H6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 183 192 198 189 125 MB/s Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51.6% Above average	Read 122 Write 165 Mixed 194 SusWrite 178 38% 165 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 57.8 4K Mixed 24.6 92% 34 MB/s	DQ Read 144 DQ Write 202 DQ Mixed 96.7 94% 148 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 100%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 106GB free Firmware: 1A04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 58 58 58 57 59 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	44.4% Average	Read 94.4 Write 118 Mixed 81.1 SusWrite 59.1 65% 88.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.3 146% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 79%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44 40,147 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 298GB free Firmware: 1118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 110 110 108 107 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	62% Good	Read 107 Write 107 Mixed 62 SusWrite 109 70% 96.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 258GB free Firmware: KC48 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 118 119 119 119 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	62.4% Good	Read 98.8 Write 95.8 Mixed 50.7 SusWrite 119 67% 91 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 119% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 88%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 3GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 3.6 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.9 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 398 Write 3.2 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 3.6 70% 103 MB/s	4K Read 35.9 4K Mixed 0 200% 18 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Atermiter 2x8GB 2,316 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (78^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	61.6% Good	MC Read 25.2 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 20.4 64% 22.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 12.8 SC Mixed 16.7 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 67.8 59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 70%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16