TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Samsung 960XFH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive339% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemSamsung 960XFH  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG SAMSUNG_NP960XFH
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '23 at 00:28
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
13th Gen Intel CoreT i7-13700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 56.9
1-Core 112
2-Core 201
67% 123 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 698
64% 538 Pts
64-Core 1,493
92% 1,493 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑
This bench: 63.7%
 Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Sanyo(144D C1CC) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3959
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Lighting 25.4
Reflection 67.9
Parallax 28.4
21% 40.6 fps
MRender 25.5
Gravity 37.6
Splatting 22
23% 28.4 fps
Poor: 13% ↑
This bench: 21.4%
 Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDSN740-SDDPNQD-512G-1004 512GB
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73100004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2829 2245 2194 2283 2313 2161 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
339% Outstanding
Read 1,797
Write 2,003
Mixed 1,652
SusWrite 2,337
441% 1,948 MB/s
4K Read 54.7
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 76.3
259% 92.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,120
DQ Write 848
DQ Mixed 972
730% 980 MB/s
Poor: 209% ↑
This bench: 339%
 Great: 440%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3KL8L80CM-MGCT 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
150% Outstanding
MC Read 58.5
MC Write 70.3
MC Mixed 57.8
178% 62.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 16.5
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 99% ↑
This bench: 150%
 Great: 164%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 960XFH Builds (Compare 138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Samsung 960XFH

CPU
Core i9-13900HIntelBench 107%, 5,250 samples84x
Core i7-13700HIntelBench 104%, 4,359 samples53x
Gen Intel CoreT i7-13700H13thBench 90%, 26 samples1x
GPU
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 19%, 14,602 samples77x
RTX 4070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 132%, 10,174 samples40x
RTX 4050 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 96%, 5,690 samples21x
SSD
MZVL21T0HCLR-00B 1TBSamsungBench 359%, 283 samples104x
MZVL2512HCJQ-00B 512GBSamsungBench 313%, 190 samples9x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung  $170Bench 416%, 138,083 samples7x
RAM
K3KL9L90CM-MGCT 8x4GBSamsungBench 139%, 580 samples84x
K3KL8L80CM-MGCT 8x2GBSamsungBench 137%, 912 samples54x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback