Today's hottest deals

Samsung 960XFH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive339% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemSamsung 960XFH  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG SAMSUNG_NP960XFH
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '23 at 00:28
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
13th Gen Intel CoreT i7-13700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 56.9
1-Core 112
2-Core 201
67% 123 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 698
64% 538 Pts
64-Core 1,493
92% 1,493 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Sanyo(144D C1CC) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3959
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Lighting 25.4
Reflection 67.9
Parallax 28.4
21% 40.6 fps
MRender 25.5
Gravity 37.6
Splatting 22
23% 28.4 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDSN740-SDDPNQD-512G-1004 512GB
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73100004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2829 2245 2194 2283 2313 2161 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
339% Outstanding
Read 1,797
Write 2,003
Mixed 1,652
SusWrite 2,337
441% 1,948 MB/s
4K Read 54.7
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 76.3
259% 92.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,120
DQ Write 848
DQ Mixed 972
730% 980 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 339%
Great: 433%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3KL8L80CM-MGCT 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
150% Outstanding
MC Read 58.5
MC Write 70.3
MC Mixed 57.8
178% 62.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 16.5
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 115%
This bench: 150%
Great: 165%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 960XFH Builds (Compare 168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Samsung 960XFH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback