Today's hottest deals

Samsung 940XFG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive194% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemSamsung 940XFG  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP940XFG-KC1BE
Memory6.2 GB free of 16 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230330
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateApr 21 '24 at 12:04
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1360P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
50% Above average
Memory 39.5
1-Core 93.8
2-Core 196
57% 110 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 524
52% 424 Pts
64-Core 915
57% 915 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 50%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Sanyo(144D C882) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4314
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Lighting 22
Reflection 28.4
Parallax 25.5
18% 25.3 fps
MRender 23.5
Gravity 27.7
Splatting 19.8
19% 23.7 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDSN740-SDDPNQD-512G-1004 512GB
224GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73100004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1452 1290 1151 959 1253 1163 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 1,408
Write 597
Mixed 1,306
SusWrite 1,211
254% 1,131 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 78.4
4K Mixed 31.4
145% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 675
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 509
366% 482 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 194%
Great: 433%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3KL8L80CM-MGCT 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
127% Outstanding
MC Read 45
MC Write 63.7
MC Mixed 48.9
150% 52.5 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 15.4
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 336
12% 336 ns
Poor: 115%
This bench: 127%
Great: 165%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 14" 1280 720 SDC4186
Typical 940XFG Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Samsung 940XFG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback