Toshiba Satellite Pro C650

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (95%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite Pro C650  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20110801
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 07 '23 at 04:11
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 95%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron B800
, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Memory 27.3
1-Core 26.2
2-Core 38.8
19% 30.8 Pts
4-Core 37.7
8-Core 34.7
5% 36.2 Pts
64-Core 41.6
3% 41.6 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FCE0) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.51% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.73 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.7
1% 0.9 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.51%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Laptop Thin SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$23
363GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DEM9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 89 83 77 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 103
Write 100
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 83.2
63% 86 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1.7
333% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 64%
Toshiba MK3275GSX 320GB
267GB free
Firmware: GT001M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 65 67 66 68 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 59.4
Write 50.9
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 65.8
40% 54.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 36%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
17% Very poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 5.7
17% 5.97 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 5.3
14% 5.07 GB/s
Latency 271
15% 271 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite Pro C650 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite Pro C650

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback