Toshiba Satellite C650

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemToshiba Satellite C650  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory1.6 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110801
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 05 '21 at 19:12
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron B800
, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
46.4% Average
Memory 80.4
1-Core 39.6
2-Core 76.2
44% 65.4 Pts
4-Core 76
8-Core 79.2
10% 77.6 Pts
64-Core 75.1
5% 75.1 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FCE0) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
0.5% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.73 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.6
1% 0.87 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.5%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34
223GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 18 45 29 36 52 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 61.9
Write 50.1
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 33.5
34% 46 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston TSB1333D3S9SR8/2G 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.6% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 10.8
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 9
25% 8.6 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite C650 Builds (Compare 79 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C650

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback