Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 154%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 153%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics169% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive128% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 06 '23 at 17:03
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Memory 87.5
1-Core 136
2-Core 269
90% 164 Pts
4-Core 511
8-Core 937
87% 724 Pts
64-Core 1,332
82% 1,332 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$429
Asus(1043 880E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
169% Outstanding
Lighting 253
Reflection 223
Parallax 220
206% 232 fps
MRender 258
Gravity 164
Splatting 133
145% 185 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 169%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG SPECTRIX S40G 256GB
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VB411D43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 542 307 237 291 236 252 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 71.4
Write 857
Mixed 938
SusWrite 311
126% 544 MB/s
4K Read 54.9
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 71.1
236% 80.6 MB/s
DQ Read 741
DQ Write 737
DQ Mixed 170
284% 549 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 128%
Great: 273%
Samsung MZALQ256HAJD-000L1 256GB
112GB free
Firmware: 7L1QFXV7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 868 446 192 193 191 173 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 1269
Write 904
Mixed 888
SusWrite 344
190% 851 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 65.7
227% 81.2 MB/s
DQ Read 482
DQ Write 805
DQ Mixed 576
455% 621 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 171%
Great: 177%
Apacer AS340 240GB
123GB free
Firmware: V4.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 142 142 143 143 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 480
Write 412
Mixed 358
SusWrite 168
79% 355 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 24.3
123% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 33.6
74% 150 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 95%
MLD M200 SATA SSD 240GB
52GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 128 112 109 109 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 463
Write 179
Mixed 344
SusWrite 168
64% 288 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 80.6
4K Mixed 41.9
155% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 215
181% 261 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 89%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
904GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 167 170 168 167 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 162
Mixed 118
SusWrite 168
117% 158 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$66
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 89 91 90 90 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 73
Write 79.2
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 89
60% 80 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
MC Read 40.8
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 39.9
102% 35.9 GB/s
SC Read 28
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 38.3
89% 31 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,652 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $310
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback