Today's hottest deals

Medion MD34369/C888

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion MD34369/C888  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION B360H4-EM
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 03 '23 at 20:13
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$135
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 67.8
2-Core 219
68% 124 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 353
47% 353 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)
Elitegroup(1019 A4A3) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
3.37% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 7.4
5% 6.6 fps
MRender 0.1
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.1
0% 0.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.37%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 512GB 512GB
433GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1011B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 58 309 89 9.4 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 463
Write 396
Mixed 388
SusWrite 154
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 62.8
4K Mixed 18.2
100% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 86.8
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 32.9
68% 132 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 211%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C16 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.7% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 20.9
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 21.1
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MD34369/C888 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

System: Medion MD34369/C888

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback