Asus X99-E

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	22.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-E (all builds)
Memory	124.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170331
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 12 '17 at 02:35
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2697 V4 196 User benchmarks, average bench 75% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	78.1% Very good	Memory 87.9 1-Core 93.4 2-Core 188 72% 123 Pts	4-Core 367 8-Core 751 66% 559 Pts	64-Core 2,211 137% 2,211 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350 22,303 User benchmarks, average bench 20% EVGA(3842 1573) 1.2GB Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 340.52 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	22.5% Poor	Lighting 27.1 Reflection 41 Parallax 30.3 22% 32.8 fps	MRender 35.3 Gravity 21.9 Splatting 28.4 23% 28.5 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 22.5% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme THNSN51T02DU7 TO 1TB 159 User benchmarks, average bench 188% 716GB free (System drive) Firmware: 57GA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	171% Outstanding	Read 1,343 Write 1,076 Mixed 1,004 254% 1,141 MB/s	4K Read 32.5 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 29.1 147% 58.8 MB/s	DQ Read 38.8 DQ Write 322 DQ Mixed 28.5 67% 130 MB/s
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 171% Great: 248%
Samsung MZ7WD480HCGM-000G3 480GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 447GB free Firmware: NX00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6866 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1416 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 98 98 240 (B2) Unknown 91 91 859 (B3) Unknown 91 91 442 (B4) Unknown 91 91 9637 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 66 39 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 1 1 215868500368	102% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 450 Mixed 463 105% 470 MB/s	4K Read 27 4K Write 82.4 4K Mixed 40.7 137% 50 MB/s	DQ Read 270 DQ Write 285 DQ Mixed 131 139% 229 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 102%
Samsung SM843T 480GB 374 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 447GB free Firmware: NX02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 19180 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 45 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 99 99 3 (B2) Unknown 95 95 483 (B3) Unknown 95 95 252 (B4) Unknown 95 95 10013 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 65 60 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 28 28 3092621235	92.6% Outstanding	Read 505 Write 358 Mixed 413 94% 425 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 78.8 4K Mixed 38.1 125% 46.5 MB/s	DQ Read 289 DQ Write 223 DQ Mixed 123 128% 212 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 92.6% Great: 95%
Samsung SM843T 480GB 374 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 447GB free Firmware: NS00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 14685 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3043 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 93 93 1243 (B2) Unknown 96 96 390 (B3) Unknown 96 96 198 (B4) Unknown 96 96 10106 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 65 65 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 1 1 153906705537	77.2% Very good	Read 501 Write 275 Mixed 380 85% 385 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 83.3 4K Mixed 17.4 101% 41.2 MB/s	DQ Read 268 DQ Write 221 DQ Mixed 81.6 105% 190 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18ASF2G72PZ-2G3B1 8x16GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 109% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB RIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2448 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	143% Outstanding	MC Read 67.3 MC Write 56.6 MC Mixed 50.9 166% 58.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 17 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 69.6 57% 69.6 ns
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 143% Great: 140%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-E Builds (Compare 527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 84%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 75%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-E

CPU
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	273x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	89x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	64x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	101x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	59x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	40x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	15x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	15x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	23x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	15x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $398

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16