HP 860-180st

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 860-180st  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B4B
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161206
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateNov 11 '17 at 11:21
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Memory 90.7
1-Core 126
2-Core 242
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 702
67% 554 Pts
64-Core 702
44% 702 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
HP(103C 2B4D) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.46
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.3% Below average
Lighting 40.9
Reflection 39.4
Parallax 35.3
33% 38.5 fps
MRender 35
Gravity 35.3
Splatting 31.2
27% 33.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB2Q-512G-1006 512GB
323GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2180006 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 395
Write 355
Mixed 361
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 66.9
4K Mixed 25.3
100% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 61.7
101% 196 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
2TB free
Firmware: HP51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 163
Mixed 170
129% 172 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.54
4K Mixed 0.25
72% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 113%
WD Elements 2TB
157GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Read 32.4
Write 30
Mixed 14.3
31% 25.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.77
4K Mixed 0.17
68% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 44%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB
7GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
29.5% Poor
Read 123
Write 37.2
Mixed 44.4
71% 68 MB/s
4K Read 3.19
4K Write 0.93
4K Mixed 0.43
58% 1.52 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAD1 Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 1315 CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAD1 Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.4% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 23.2
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 24
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 860-180st Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

System: HP 860-180st

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $380
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback