Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardINTEL X99
Memory29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '22 at 23:31
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 102
2-Core 202
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 481
52% 415 Pts
64-Core 471
29% 471 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Nvidia(10DE 1401) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 462.96
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.6% Poor
Lighting 37.3
Reflection 40.1
Parallax 34.1
30% 37.2 fps
MRender 34.3
Gravity 36.5
Splatting 32.5
28% 34.4 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 480GB-$81
363GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 349 353 358 361 364 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 378
Write 363
Mixed 322
SusWrite 355
80% 354 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 30.7
4K Mixed 20.6
67% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 178
168% 260 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40DB3-CWE 1x31GB
1 of 4 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.5% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 11.7
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 12.4
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,851 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback