PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 18.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 88.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z440 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 212B |
Memory | 19 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20210521 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Jun 24 '22 at 16:38 |
Run Duration | 170 Seconds |
Run User | ALB-User |
Background CPU | 41% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
|
60.5%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
PwrHis(1787 3000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1176 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
|
18.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 349 341 336 313 286 MB/s
|
88.1%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$46
10GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 43 43 41 43 43 MB/s
|
26.6%
Poor
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint MP4 2.5" 500GB
130GB free
Firmware: 2AK10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 92 94 88 94 95 MB/s
|
53.4%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393A5143DB0-CPB 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
87.2%
Excellent
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples | 1,227x |
Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples | 1,026x |
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples | 854x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 735x |
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 373x |
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 222x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 9% - Terrible | Total price: $440 |