Today's hottest deals

HP 280 Pro G6 Microtower PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 280 Pro G6 Microtower PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8948
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210807
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateDec 02 '22 at 12:13
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 50.4
1-Core 118
2-Core 223
69% 130 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 587
60% 487 Pts
64-Core 606
38% 606 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 8948) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
4.28% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 6.7
5% 5.7 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 0.2
3% 4.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.28%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CyberX 128GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1102A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 317 135 271 269 275 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 961
Write 486
Mixed 515
SusWrite 274
124% 559 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 79.8
4K Mixed 17.8
107% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 398
DQ Write 472
DQ Mixed 326
276% 399 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
929GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 179 180 179 181 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 175
Mixed 108
SusWrite 180
121% 165 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
224% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 108%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
0 Samsung M378A5244CB0-CWE 8GB
2667, 3200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.9% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 9.5
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 7.3
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 159
25% 159 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 280 Pro G6 Microtower PC Builds (Compare 179 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP 280 Pro G6 Microtower PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $223
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback