Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics90.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive274% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory37.5 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 01 '22 at 23:52
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 77.2
1-Core 116
2-Core 228
78% 141 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 675
65% 535 Pts
64-Core 834
52% 834 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
Device(7377 2000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 517.40
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.5% Outstanding
Lighting 113
Reflection 106
Parallax 109
92% 109 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 101
Splatting 92.6
87% 109 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
395GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1982 970 809 819 819 821 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
274% Outstanding
Read 2,529
Write 2,338
Mixed 1,808
SusWrite 1,037
432% 1,928 MB/s
4K Read 59.6
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 76.8
246% 81.8 MB/s
DQ Read 918
DQ Write 546
DQ Mixed 786
571% 750 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 274%
Great: 355%
Lexar SSD 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: V4.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 136 136 136 136 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 465
Write 441
Mixed 367
SusWrite 162
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 75.1
4K Mixed 26.4
124% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 33.2
72% 146 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
533GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 175 174 176 176 178 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 153
Write 114
Mixed 83.1
SusWrite 176
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 40GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 14.7
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 16.3
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,031 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $475
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback