Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706IHRB_FA706IHRB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
24 months ago, 24 months ago.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706IHRB_FA706IHRB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA706IHRB
Memory2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220411
Uptime15.6 Days
Run DateNov 26 '22 at 09:02
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
46.6% Average
Memory 55.6
1-Core 85.3
2-Core 149
55% 96.6 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 282
31% 244 Pts
64-Core 293
18% 293 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 16FD) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.02.01
Relative performance (0th percentile)
4.77% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 54.6
Parallax 8
4% 22.6 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 9
6% 7.03 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 4.77%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
367GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 523 556 683 431 220 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 921
Write 718
Mixed 719
SusWrite 463
158% 705 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 30.2
4K Mixed 25.8
89% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 98.5
DQ Mixed 181
130% 172 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 100%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
29.3% Poor
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 10.3
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 7.4
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706IHRB_FA706IHRB Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706IHRB_FA706IHRB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback