Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics44.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
24 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemHP OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87C3
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220324
Uptime14.6 Days
Run DateNov 23 '22 at 22:02
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
65.2% Good
Memory 60.7
1-Core 126
2-Core 241
76% 143 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 510
56% 445 Pts
64-Core 572
35% 572 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5500-$160
HP(103C 86DE) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.10.16.02
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.5% Average
Lighting 55.3
Reflection 58.4
Parallax 88.2
45% 67.3 fps
MRender 50.9
Gravity 74.9
Splatting 38.2
43% 54.7 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS2130 500GB SSD
230GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS213530
SusWrite @10s intervals: 880 885 47 154 92 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 50.2
Write 252
Mixed 609
SusWrite 360
73% 318 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 46.3
164% 63.2 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 622
DQ Mixed 447
350% 471 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 204%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB-$29
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
58.9% Above average
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 23.3
61% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 19.1
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx Builds (Compare 3,884 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

System: HP OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 119% - Outstanding Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback